Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron Struthers who wrote (32912)	6/13/1998 2:34:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Ron: The thing about SI is that posts are always retrievable. Here is a post from November 14 which was from your message to subscribers that you encouraged to be posted on SI. This is a far cry from clearly stating institutions were NOT BUYING. "U.S. Institutions are proposing to fund IPM with a convertible note for a 25% premium over the stock price. Why in gods name would institutions do this in todays market. This is the most bullish sign you will ever discover in a junior gold exploreer. It is very obvious to me that these Institutions know a lot more than what was in todays news release. Don't kid yourself, they have met with Bateman and know exactly where IPM is headed."

To: Ron Struthers who wrote (32912)	6/13/1998 2:39:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

And how about this one Ron, from Sunday, November 16. Message 2742392 You have to expect, Ron, when you post B.S. on this thread that you are going to be called on it.