Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Pueblo who wrote (1591)	6/13/1998 8:13:00 PM
From: X Y Zebra	Respond to of 12810

"Outside SI" nomination: Bureaucratic Fertilizer Agreement in jeopardy.... From the North Korean er.... Bureaucrats Read this: (original link suggested by George Papadopoulos at the World Cup Thread: #reply-4853069, thanks George, you get the credit for this one, great find) korea-np.co.jp (then click on "N-S Relations") Talk about "bureaucratic fertilizer agreement" (from the Secretariat of the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland) You just have got to love this: (excerpt) "At the talks the south side raised as preconditions political issues which have nothing to do with the supply of fertilizers. It asserted that if the preconditions were not met, it could not offer fertilizers." I thought that political issues would equate to a rich supply of fertilizer Only the bureaucrats mon!! are capable of producing such Moronic Literature... I guess you could say that their Literary "art" is rich and, well... fertilized.... The full text: DPRK Blames Seoul for Stalled Inter-Korean Talks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PYONGYANG, April 20 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Secretariat of the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland released a statement concerning the failure of inter-Korean vice minister-level talks which began in Beijing on April 11. The talks, which began after the South Korean authorities officially suggested supply of fertilizers were deadlocked without scoring any success due to the South side's unreasonable position and wrong behavior, the spokesman said, and continued: At the talks the south side raised as preconditions political issues which have nothing to do with the supply of fertilizers. It asserted that if the preconditions were not met, it could not offer fertilizers. The south side tried to get something from the north in return for the fertilizers, talking about "reciprocity" and preconditions. This is a mean and foolish act intended to mock the north, deceive the people into believing that the south does a lot of things for the north and win popularity. We feel deep apprehensions as to whether we can discuss the national reunification issue decisive of the nation's destiny with them who regard inter-Korean relations and humanitarian assistance between the fellow countrymen as a bargaining chip. Worse still, the south side, ignoring the agreement that the talks would be held behind closed doors, allowed the Korean broadcasting system to plant a tapping apparatus at the negotiating table. The senseless and despicable act, unprecedented in the history of inter-Korean dialogue, shows well the behavior of the south side with no sense of elementary morality and courtesy for talks. We are deeply doubtful whether the "Ministry of National Unification" headed by Kang In Dok, who has already been condemned by the South Korean people, can be our partner in the talks. Through the talks the south side revealed that the present regime is little different from the Kim Young Sam regime in seeking confrontation with the north. The south Korean authorities should be held wholly responsible for the deadlocked talks and the gloomy prospect of inter-Korean relations. Back Home ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright c 1998 The People's Korea. All rights reserved.

To: Don Pueblo who wrote (1591)	6/14/1998 1:06:00 AM
From: Little Engine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

TLC, I had said I thought I would hear from him within 48 hours, although he said he would never contact me again. Didn't even take 24 hours! The following long-winded PM: <<<<To: Little Engine From: Dusty Vestal Saturday, Jun 13 1998 3:18PM ET Little Engine, some things I don't understand... My suspension will probably begin on Monday, which is fine since I'll be out of town anyway, but let me clarify a few points: #1 - Yes I did lie about you altering that message, but that's ONLY because you lie about who you are, or who you aren't.... You never let anybody know what your purpose is of getting on a thread and bashing it to pieces... #2 - Another thing I don't understand is why you waste SO MUCH of your energy trying to find stocks to bash?....How is that going to make you any money?... That's why alot of people think you are a market maker, they look at the stocks are you on via your profile, and it's usually only the ones you are tearing down.... Why not spend more constructive POSITIVE energy finding undervalued companies which can make it big some day???? It would be good for you and good for others as well, and many appreciate the DD.... It seems like whenever somebody does some DD and tries to locate an undervalued company, you have to tell them why you don't think it's undervalued.... It's not that opinions aren't wanted, but when you get on a thread to bash, more people jump on the bash bandwagon for NO REASON AT ALL, WITHOUT DOING ANY DD, and sooner or later the thread turns sour,and people start to bail in FEAR(Trading on emotion) without doing any DD WHATSOEVER, and thus the stock price starts to plummet.... As you should know by now, I NEVER HYPE A STOCK, just check my messages? Why don't I hype stocks?? Because I'm as against hyping as I am against bashing.... Let investors learn for themselves!!! How are they going to learn otherwise. There are alot of undervalued companies out there, just check every year and find out which ones exploded from penny status... Why not work on finding some of these companies? #3 Regarding FAMH, yes I lost a bunch of money in that stock!!.. One of the main reasons I left the thread is to get away from the bashing and negativity,,,, I don't know, the stock might still turn around since IRA is out there.... I haven't made an opinion yet... However, I recently joined ICVI, only beause I feel the company is undervalued, and has potential.... But then I saw your posts, and it was like "here we go again" ----- I guess that means I'll have to sell ICVI now........ #4- If I do get suspended, I won't understand really why.... I mean, how many times on the thread do you here people say, "if you are going to cast insults, take it to private email" ----- So I don't see why Jill would care what we did through private EMAIL.... it's not affecting her board at all......So the fact that you just didn't want to deal with the email that was upsetting you in a private message as opposed to getting me suspended from SI, which had nothing to do with it, bothered me very much......... Yes, my pet peeves obviously are people who get on a thread to bash a stock without doing DD!!!... It would be different if you bashed it after you called the company and got so and so information that you weren't comfortable with, as opposed to bashing other people's DD....... Please think on these things Dusty>>> Excerpts from Dusty #reply-4494184 (thanks TLC!) A) <<<<< I know I just sold my FAMH as did alot of people because they were talking reverse merger over there...>>>>> B) <<<< I'm a beginning investor, so I may not even know what I'm talking about... >>>> As opposed to (above): A) <<<<One of the main reasons I left the FAMH thread is to get away from the bashing and negativity,,,>>>> and B) Apparently he knows everything now... except why he left FAMH. What a difference a month makes. I agree with his sneaking suspicions. No clue as to what he's talking about. Not sure who I am, or who I am not? LE