Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : JAWS Technologies - NASDAQ (NM):JAWZ -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wooly who wrote (456)	6/14/1998 1:12:00 AM
From: Moonglow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3086

Wooly, I do have a question. In searching the Web, I found that other encryption companies have in the past offered challenges...usually it was for $1 million dollars...not $5 million. Would you happen to know if those $1 million dollar challenges were ever broken? Also....bbruin once stated that encryption codes could be broken...but if I'm remembering correctly....one factor would be the length of time it would take to break it. Now JAWZ is giving a deadline of 30 days with which to break the code. I am betting that nobody will be able to break that code within the 30 day limit. Now if someone had two years with which to do it....that might be a different story. But according to what I read on JAWZ website....and once again, this is if I am remembering it correctly......it is recommended to change one's code with regularity. For example, like once a month. Is that right? Juanita

To: Wooly who wrote (456)	6/14/1998 1:32:00 AM
From: justaninvestor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3086

<<Encryption is not magic, it's mathematics and algorhythm engines>> Who's arguing that? Given unlimited time and money, I suppose anything could be broken. I just feel that it is statistically impossible to crack this code in 30 days. But if you guys do it, great! Hope your portion of the $5M is significant. bruin P.S. Assuming your profile is correct, I'm surprised that someone who's in your field would spell algorithm as algorhythm! Unless, of course, you're going to use the rhythm method to crack this code <g>