To: Brad Morris who wrote (3029 ) 6/14/1998 11:05:00 AM From: Thomas George Warner Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 8879
Mr. Morris (you are now 16), this is not a matter of differing investment styles, and please don't continue to try and pass it off as that. While I respect and support your right to invest using any method you chose, I am appalled that many posters have made irresponsible posts relative to the investment data or prospects of GLOW, which may cause INEXPERIENCED INVESTORS to invest or sell for the wrong reasons. While you may very well feel comfortable with the information that you have and understand the risks involved, less experienced investors may not. I have no inherent right to tell you what to buy or sell, that is your business, and while I may shake my head in wonderment, its none of my business what you do with your money. This is a matter of credibility, and the way that many on this thread have insulted and condemned posters that ask pointed and relevant questions in an attempt to analyze the company for long term investing. And yes there is a vast difference between short term day trading or speculation and long term investing. I am not a speculator in the long term. This thread is not for the exclusive use of persons or companies that have a vested interest in whether GLOWs price goes up or down. Think about it? It is hyped posts like yours "HUGE growth rate", arrived at without supporting evidence that has prolonged these debates and has now involved far to many people. If you have the information and data to show that GLOWs long term growth rate is "HUGE" than let everyone see it so they will understand and can use the information to help them arrive at a better investment decision. This is not bashing, just a simple request for understanding, from one investor to another. Why is it so difficult when a question is asked to either say, I have not been able to find the information, or here is what I have found etc. That kind of input or exchange stops argumentative posts. One has to only wonder when posters attempt to confuse by attacks and misleading data. And lastly it was always the intention of SI to have meaningful interchange of ideas and information so that TOGETHER we could make better informed investment decisions and thus reduce the risk. In my opinion we are now doing exactly the opposite.