Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (7578)	6/14/1998 12:20:00 PM
From: KZAP	Respond to of 11708

Ok, I've heard that. Good thoughts. Here's some of mine. I know of companies that went from having one well, that only produced 2 bbls a day, ran by one man, to a company producing 100 times that amount. Almost all the wells were given or were bought for next to nothing. They were all worked over and made into something profitable. You said it too.....One man's junk, another man's............ And as far as Envirotech, You have a hurdle to jump. May not be such a big one, but look at an example. I must dispose of building material waste daily. A few years back it was much easier, less regulated, much cheaper. The EPA steps in, starts regulateing it and fineing & closing down places for non-compliance. What happens? "We" go else where. Looking for a 'good deal'. Many companies dump where they can, the EPA finds out, comes in, and fines the companies, makes them clean it up, ect., ect. Now, a few years later, everyone is now passing on the extra costs to coustomers and compling with the EPA. Why? Well, the dump fees are much less than the fines &/or clean-up costs. I know this for a fact! Want to see a few EPA letters? KZAP - First & last post to the CSMA thread for today. Not worried about spellin'......... Out camping. With sandals on, spittin' sunflower seeds!

To: TraderGreg who wrote (7578)	6/14/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: Gary Jacobs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11708

wow, are we starting to get it or what? i think the overall views expressed in these posts indicates the general perspective most of us share. the epa has to be very excited about the class v well and i would agree that there would probably be heavier enforcement of new and existing laws with the availability of this facility. i would even anticipate some large 'example' cases early on to send the message to business that a new standard of enforcement is in effect. i don't think the company is intentionally holding back information on the status of the well. in my opinion, (and it's just that, an opinion) i would think that the epa is very much involved (at least in an oversight/inspection role) in the progress of the class v well and that csma would be sensitive to their involvement and careful with the release of information. also, let's not overlook the potential value of Mr. Nelson beyond just oil and gas exploration. some of the largest polluters are oil and gas companies. with his credentials i would expect he has tremendous respect and many contacts. those aren't bad attributes for opening doors. anyway, just my opinion. cheers all, and welcome aboard MM. gary