Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (1839)	6/14/1998 2:24:00 PM
From: KipferlMeister	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5143

Okay, let me try this again: IPM held 1,160,000 uncontested shares of MGAU of which 800,000 have just been sold, off market, to another party. MGAU has right of first refusal to broker a similar deal on IPM's remaining shares -- whether that's just the balance of those 1,160,000 or of a larger number including other, disputed shares, makes no difference since none are likely to come on the market. Therefore, IPM's cash crunch and their (presumed) need to liquidate their MGAU holdings should not be a negative factor on MGAU's stock price. Clear?? BTW, just how does one "flip" 800,000 shares of an illiquid stock like MGAU <VBG>??