SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dixie7777 who wrote (940)6/14/1998 3:17:00 PM
From: ColleenB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11684
 
This is not necessarily the case. Property owners, that is "surface" owners do not own subsurface mineral rights unless their deed states such. Generally speaking, when a person buys a piece of property, they only legally own the surface and not the subsurface. It is very common for an oil company to own mineral rights and not be the "land" owner. This is very common place in the southwest. Oil companies commonly contract with (surface) property owners and make payments for "land use" during drilling operations and they may even allow some royalities (depending on how astute the farmer's lawyer is) if/when a productive horizon is penetrated/discovered....the royalities can be in the form of future land use, accessiblility, etc. And in the older fields, the farmers were able to contract productivity percentages.



To: Dixie7777 who wrote (940)6/14/1998 6:21:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Respond to of 11684
 
That in fact appears to be their incentive to grant the mineral rughts to MTEI, and why we will probably NOT see any transfer of cash for those mineral rights. the land is still owned by the investors and or a company they own, IMO.

Um, mind clarifying this statement?