Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SYQUEST -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FuzzFace who wrote (6702)	6/15/1998 12:17:00 AM
From: Michael Coley	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7685

RE: Buy and Hold Tech? Edwin, >> I read on one of these threads about a year ago that no tech stock should ever be a "buy and hold" position. I didn't believe it then, but I'm beginning to. << Although that might be true in general, there are a number of tech stocks that have consistently performed over the years: MSFT, INTC, DELL, etc. - Michael Coley - wwol.com

To: FuzzFace who wrote (6702)	6/15/1998 12:46:00 AM
From: THAI DUC TRAN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7685

Edwin, I am new, but I have been enjoyed reading the good comments about syqt on this thread to learn more about how this stock is doing regarding to the recent news and its history financial performance. I observed that the good comments are coming from someone who follow this stock for a long time or one who can give some factual analysis, but NOT truly from the IOM rival investor like yourself. I have recognized that you are one of the major contributors to IOM thread. Obviously, by any purposes, you can say anything on this thread, but I doubt about your expressions in anyway. In my opinion, if you are holding IOM shares, and not holding any of SYQT shares, you don't have to scare about and just spend all your time to contribute in the IOM thread as Tim Dickson has mentioned before <<I can see why anyone that is into IOMEGA or short in SyQuest may be scared of the competition. >> Thanks