SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth R Miller who wrote (10227)6/15/1998 1:30:00 AM
From: Chris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
i wouldn't use the macro projections.. not very accurate imo.



To: Kenneth R Miller who wrote (10227)6/15/1998 2:46:00 AM
From: Chris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42787
 
for tscn (we will call it that ,since it's easier to type) <g>,

i use the telescan rankings.. since i have my own css buy scan, i dont use the search engines.. however, telescan has some REALLY powerful search engines, from TA searches to FA #'s too.

i know jenna at marketgems thread likes the telescan search too. check her website for specific search criterias.

again, it's up to your imagination on what to use and how to use it. since i usually have More picks than i can buy, i usually "screen" my picks via telescan rankings and choose the "fundamentally strong" rankings to filter out my buys.

other than the rankings, and search engines, everything is else is found on yahoo for FREE.. in other words, unless you're using those features, then it's an EXPENSIVE service.

just my thoughts.



To: Kenneth R Miller who wrote (10227)6/15/1998 3:03:00 AM
From: Chris  Respond to of 42787
 
<<I'm seeing INTC at 74 on July
17th.. INTC closed friday at around 68 Do you have any comments? I might try a
buy stop at 67 1/2 >>

hi ken..

i doubt intc can get abv 70-71.. heavy support was broken on the merced news.

that's why i wouldn't even "look" at the macro world thingy.



To: Kenneth R Miller who wrote (10227)6/15/1998 3:09:00 AM
From: Chris  Respond to of 42787
 
ken - see previous post on intc.