SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (20038)6/15/1998 10:52:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 24154
 
Most Regard Microsoft Favorably, a Poll Shows nytimes.com

Of course, most, or at least a clear majority, give Bill Clinton a high job rating. And I must note that Reggie does the usual Mind of Reg(TM) context job on precise citation of the facts, at least those he agrees with. Clearly cited source, and I'm sure the quotes, wherever they came from, are totally representative. It's true that people answering a telephone poll are likely to know more about antitrust law as Reggie does, on the average.

When asked about Microsoft's business practices, 54 percent of those polled said they agreed with the statement that "Microsoft uses legally acceptable business tactics to sell and distribute its products."

By contrast, only 19 percent said they agreed that "Microsoft uses illegal sales and business tactics to force people to buy its products and keep other products from being used" -- a pivotal point in the Government's antitrust case. The remainder agreed with neither statement or had no opinion.


So what. How many of that 54% do you think have the vaguest idea what's legal and what's not, in this context? Personally, if answering honestly, I'd have to "agree with neither statement", it's a pretty stupidly worded choice. Given a matter where most people don't know the details, and what they've heard is more likely to come from the Microsoft PR machine than anywhere else, "innocent till proven guilty" will rule. Microsoft has been really straightforward about explaining the details of the "standard Microsoft business practice" which Reggie has celebrated for its inevitable "hijacking of the internet".

People are split almost evenly on whether the Government did the right thing in filing suit against Microsoft, with 35 percent saying it was right and 27 percent saying it was a mistake. The remaining 38 percent were undecided or were not aware of the case.

I wouldn't quite call that evenly split, but whatever.

Still, many Americans appear to be embracing the information age tentatively, if not fearfully. More than half of all computer users, 52 percent, say they have never installed a software program -- a basic step in computing. While technology enthusiasts never tire of extolling the virtues of computers as personalized tools of empowerment, the Times/CBS poll suggests that a large share of the computer-using public has no interest in tailoring their machines or changing them.

They're clearly content to let Bill take them where they want to go, he notes dryly. They'll be happy to get their history of software from the next edition of Encarta, too.

The portrait of many people as passive recipients of computer technology may also cast some doubt on one of Microsoft's arguments in its dispute with the Government. The Justice Department, Microsoft says, has overstated the advantage the company enjoys because the main desktop screen that users see when they turn on their machines is Microsoft's Windows. That first screen can be easily changed or modified, Microsoft insists.

It can, but the poll indicates that fine-tuning software is beyond many people.

Consider Christopher Rogers, a 25-year-old medical student in Philadelphia, who seems little concerned by the dominance of Microsoft's Windows operating system.

"Microsoft's Windows is a great product," he said. "It is a monopoly but not in the traditional sense of controlling markets to raise prices."


Offhand, I'd guess Mr. Rogers has never experienced an OS that doesn't randomly fall to pieces over time; I'm a little dubious of his judgement on what constitutes a "great product". Windows 98 is supposed to suck less, I hear.

Cheers, Dan.



To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (20038)6/15/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: Bearded One  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Which goes to show why this lawsuit is so hurtful to Microsoft--- what do you think the results would have been had the poll been taken a year ago?



To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (20038)6/15/1998 12:40:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 24154
 
Survey: Microsoft plays fair news.com

So, here's the article for those who want to check it out unfiltered by the elusive context of the Mind of Reg(TM). A counterquote sans bold highlighting of "the TRUTH":

Still, a majority of those polled consider Microsoft to be a monopoly and said that that regulators should continue their investigation of the company.

The poll also casts computer users as "passive recipients of computer technology," as the Times put it. More than half of computer users polled said they never have installed a software program.


Of course, interested readers are free to get more details from the NYT article, but they're just trying to sell advertising. Or, you can trust the Mind of Reg(TM), he'll help take you where Bill wants you to go.

Cheers, Dan.



To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (20038)6/20/1998 12:28:00 AM
From: Keith Hankin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
A majority of people polled agree that Microsoft uses "legally acceptable" business
practices, according to a newly released survey by the New York Times and CBS.


Since when do we use polls to determine what is legally acceptable business practices?