Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (45832)	6/15/1998 10:49:00 AM
From: Electric	Respond to of 58727

Lisa, O-T There are always the back and forth calls that go for and against.. but 5 points is 5 points.. that is money.. There were numerous calls that werent made for and against.. One being the 2nd to last drive by MJ.. no foul ought to have been called, but there was etc. I was watching every play and I am keen to the calls. I also thought it to be interesting how after that gramps official called illegal defense on Chi like 4 times in the first half, there were no calls in the 2nd half. Anywho.. my opinion was that MJ is MJ. He will travel, throw elbows and whistles will be blown the second he gets the ball in crunch time near the hoop, even if the player guarding him plays off him like a mother.. Bottom line to me is why the hell is Johnny taking a 3 pointer with 3 seconds to go when a 2 wins the game? Makes no sense to me. And you out of anyone has to know the value of missed calls. Although I bet Mr. Salvatores missed calls may institute instant replays.. In this case there is good evidence that it threw a game. Adding 5 points changes how the Bulls play the game, and if you were watching, the Jazz were rolling at that point.. Sloan didnt learn from last year to double, triple MJ at the end.. Rambling...