Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GLOW - Global Games, Inc. - Great Profit Potential ! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (3153)	6/15/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: Brad Morris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8879

Thanks you for your DD!!!! So what are you going to do with GLOW?

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (3153)	6/15/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: mentz	Respond to of 8879

T.G.W., you are obviously are knowledgeable investor and I can tell you have had a history making money off of stocks and losing money off of stocks. When this bull market first kicked in full gear in 1995, anyone could have picked winners, but as many would learn the hard way, you could still pick losers. Anyway, though I haven't agreed with everything you have posted, I have appreciated most of your comments and questions about GLOW. Some of the responses to your inquiries are quite ridiculous, while others are acceptable. In the end, I have seen no reason to sell GLOW up to this point. Potential alone should support the .25 price, but not much beyond that. Real numbers and such should tell us a lot. Please respond promptly when Mr. Borglund responds to your questions, I will be very interested to hear what he has to say. Mentz P.S. To Cheryl and Brad, thank you very much for all of your research as well. I am still long on GLOW for the time being.

To: Thomas George Warner who wrote (3153)	6/15/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: Sammie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8879

I was equally candid with him as well and told him of the misconceptions that have arisen on this thread and the reasons for them. Did you inform him that you were reason Number 1? He admitted that there was some information that should have been given to shareholders already that was not given simply for lack of time. Getting the company on a sound footing first was the top priority. I agreed with him. Most of us have talked to him, and shared the same thoughts online. Glad you agree on something we've posted finally. Answers are be given and maybe everyone can get back to normal and get on with the intent of investing. Do You think we would listen and take into consideration anything that you will post!...let alone believe it?