Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Tusk Energy (TKE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: viper who wrote (593)	6/15/1998 3:32:00 PM
From: Robert McCullough	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1207

Viper could this be dis-information for buying opportunity or the straight poop, that something less than desired is amiss? Bob

To: viper who wrote (593)	6/15/1998 3:54:00 PM
From: grayhairs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1207

viper, It appears to me that you know what I know!! BUT, it also looks to me that it bothers you whereas it does NOT bother me at all!! viper, you shouldn't be surprised nor disappointed if this well needs an acid job. 99% of the completion engineers in this city would have bet that this well WOULD require an acid job before being placed on production!!! This is GREAT NEWS!! There is a reason to stimulate the well!!! [Bad news would have been that they didn't have any sign of gas. Or, that they had gas but it was not worth chasing because it was too sour.] I do not have Caroline flow info handy at the moment. I will have to dig into that later. And, your question on recovery is impossible for ME to answer quantitatively (the "gain" can be anything in the range of nil to infinite!!!!!). Without access to all technical data on the well it is impossible for anyone to "competently" project for you what "recovery" to expect. I'll comment more on "formation damage" later but I'm going buying some bargains now. Later, grayhairs