Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Sphar who wrote (1628)	6/15/1998 10:40:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

I came across this one on Yahoo, and yes I know it is a little unfair to go poaching where the pickings are so easy, but this one is a kind of a stand out. messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com

To: Michael Sphar who wrote (1628)	6/16/1998 3:03:00 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 12810

Wow! SI is apparently part of some conspiracy according to our good pal, falcon74: Message 4878461 &#147&#133I fear the worst we all are suspecting about SI is correct&#133 I propose the following, that we begin contacting the SEC, our senators and congressmen, 60 Minutes, WSJ, other web sites and tell them about the tactics of these shills and what SI's involvement appears to be. If SI is in cahoots with these naysayers, paid shills, etc&#133they must be exposed.&#148 Nevermind that there aren't any verifiable facts here. From the top, I've never even been on DGIV or INFE. Briefly, I corrected some erroneous info on MTEI about FBN being a "paid" site. Further down, you'd get the impression that SI is a major participant in some type of stock scandal. Simply amazing. The conspiracy thing makes me wonder if JFK isn't really alive and well on a UFO somewhere near the Bermuda Triangle. Rule #1 for any world-class moron contender: don't make an effort to verify anything. -MrB