Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (8948)	6/16/1998 12:43:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18444

"Hayton has not spoken yet, yet you condemn him" His silence has spoken. He's had plenty of time to speak up, were he so-inclined. Have you suggested to the company that a response from the company and/or Mr. Hayton would be helpful?

To: PartyTime who wrote (8948)	6/16/1998 9:21:00 AM
From: BlueFox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Hayton has not spoken yet, yet you condemn him. Where is the logic of reason and fairness there? Party, Jon's point is valid. This thread was all over Lichtman earlier because he hadn't responded. Statements were made that this proved the questioner of Kevin was correct. On the other hand, we should say Hayton's lack of response doesn't prove anything? I find it interesting that we were supposed to judge ZULU on it's own merits, and ignore anything dug up about Hayton's past. Now we're knee deep in dirt on Lichtman. No one is disputing Lichtman's past, and I don't think too many here really think it has much relevance to the value of ZULU stock. If he was part of a price drop in the past, digging up dirt on him now isn't going to raise the price any. Let's hear some ZULU news! BF