SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbn3 who wrote (47785)6/16/1998 1:47:00 AM
From: D.J.Smyth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
"more cheap PCs". this article reminds me of a cheap iron my wife bought a couple years back on the discount shelf for $10. "All irons are alike" she said. Well, three $50 shirts later (ruined), she splurged and bought an iron costing 10 times as much. How much did this iron cost? $10 + $150 + cost of new iron, including the time and trouble = too much.

most businesses have gone through the same trial and error. cheap is ALMOST never better.



To: jbn3 who wrote (47785)6/16/1998 7:36:00 AM
From: Patrick E.McDaniel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
3, Dell Computers may get a Dell unique look at startup.

Still, Dell's chief executive said Monday his company initiated talks with Microsoft about custom-designing its computers
because it sees big benefits to buyers of machines that are more closely tailored to their needs.

"We see opportunities to enhance the user experience," Michael Dell said. He said the company wants to customize the way
computers look and interact with users "and we will take our own initiative to do so."

techserver.com

Pat



To: jbn3 who wrote (47785)6/16/1998 10:03:00 AM
From: rudedog  Respond to of 176387
 
3 -
There have been numerous studies done in the last 5 years which show that the sum of all capital costs (HW and SW) in a corporate PC purchase is less than 12% of total 5 year cost of ownership. So if the PC manufacturers GAVE THE PCs AWAY it would only affect the cost of ownership by maybe 5%. This is one of the reasons that companies like CPQ are concentrating on service (35% of cost of ownership) and Dell is concentrating on maintainability (25% of cost of ownership) - these are measurable advantages that corporate america will pay for.

I discussed the advantages of lowered capital cost as a driver of book value versus utility value previously. It's not insignificant but it is not big enough to weigh heavily against the other values. If Dell improves maintainability by 10% they provide exactly the same financial benefit to customers as if they cut the HW cost by 50%.