To: Wayne Rumball who wrote (610 ) 6/16/1998 9:23:00 AM From: Brander Respond to of 2117
Here is an example of a desperate, high class, moron short. This is a classic example of short methodology, especially when they are running scared. Wayne has taken my very positive, truthful post entirely out of context. He has twisted it around so that it now appears negative, false, and full of lies. This is very clear. Here is my original post: "I'm not a TA expert, but even to my untrained eyes, the FBN chart reveals a clear repeating pattern that suggests, amazingly, zero downside risk. This is just more evidence that this is truly a perfect company. Although admittedly not a TA expert, I am a story stock expert, and here the upward potential is unlimited. So what we have here is a company (FBNA) with a chart that shows zero downward potential, and a story that begs unlimited upward potential. Perfect! The shorts would have much better luck betting Hell will freeze in 2000." Here is Mr Wayne Shorty Pants Rumball's twisted version of the above: " ...the FBN chart reveals a clear repeating pattern that suggests... zero .... This is just more evidence that ... admittedly (I am) not a TA expert, I am a story stock expert, and here the upward potential ...limited. So what we have here is a company (FBNA) with a chart that shows zero ... potential, and a story that begs ..limited ... potential. Perfect! The shorts ... have much better luck ... Hell will freeze in 2000." Taking things out of context is something the short's do well. There is a theory that the TV show '60 Minutes' is a training ground for future short sellers. Whatever, Mr Rumball is so short I can hardly see him, and his credibility is now zero. "If you're not long, you're wrong!" Brad