Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kybelle who wrote (13410)	6/16/1998 9:05:00 AM
From: William Brotherson	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 50264

TO ALL..... This is the letter that I sent to Jill after talking to a Lawyer friend about Byron's suspension from SI. He specializes in privacy vs. public Intellectual Property cases. Jill, Good Morning, Please read this entire letter before you delete it. I understand that you are being inundated with letters concerning Byron Glenn and his suspension from SI. I would respectfully request that you reinstate Mr. Glenn's privileges for the following reason. Mr. Glenn did not personally type out any information. He only provided a link to what is public information. When a person provides any type of information, even personal, whether it be in a published form, a web page, or a note on a public bulletin board or corner grocery store for that matter, that person gives up any privacy issues by implication. His agreement to have said information printed and made accessible to the general public at large can not be covered under "ANY" privacy act, even those that come from a third party agreement. The only exception to this rule falls under the Intellectual copy right, for the purpose of monetary gain directly from the said material. This has been argued time and again in courts across the land and the legal position is very clear. I do understand that you are only trying to keep your member agreement intact and enforceable, but, in this case you are wrong and have definitely made a clear case of censorship. The person who made the complaint can not have his cake and eat it too. He cannot say that "I will allow anyone to have access to my information until someone that I do not like gets it, then I will call foul under the Invasion of Privacy act. This just is not permitted under our judicial system and existing laws. So again, I ask that Mr. Glenn's SI membership be restored to full status immediately. William Brotherson (wb229ahc@micron.net)

To: kybelle who wrote (13410)	6/16/1998 9:28:00 AM
From: AnnieO	Respond to of 50264

<<<FOR ALL-Good News>>> PT UsahaBersama Sekuritas-Jakarta representative of Union Bank of Switzerland is advising DGIV on structuring financial agreements moving towards resolution in Indonesia. Will also provide consultation regarding further merger and acquisition opportunities. AnnieO

To: kybelle who wrote (13410)	6/16/1998 9:29:00 AM
From: Rob W	Respond to of 50264

bject: SI Suspension Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 22:17:02 -0500 From: SI Admin <si_admin@techstocks.com> To: bglenn@igateway.net I'm getting email from folks saying that you don't know why you were suspended. Is that the case? I sent you a message earlier that you were suspended for violating another user's privacy. You maliciously (IMO) posted a link showing his personal info including address and phone number in 3 different threads. I still can't even figure out why you targeted him in that way. Of course, a lot of people are up in arms, claiming I was "paid off" to suspend you, etc. You never replied to my earlier email, so I don't know if you got it, agree with the reason for your suspension, disagree, or whatever. Since I don't view suspensions as "punishment", I'm typically willing to lift a suspension before its expiration, given assurances the violating activity won't be repeated. It's up to you. Regards, SI Admin (Bob) yeah right read the post by William Brotherson, the reason That was done was explained in a post relayed by me just as hopefully this one will be and that is the alleged impersonation of me by that person to companies we invest they said it was a "JOKE" but to use my name is Not a Joke!