Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Forecross Corporation : Y/2000 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Juraj (Yuri) Krajci who wrote (1138)	6/16/1998 2:55:00 PM
From: J.D.R.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1654

And Crandell wonders why observers on a thread like this who aren't part of the confidence game are reluctant to give out actual names- so that crooks and kooks can harass our families? Crandell, in my experience, most of the shorts are insiders hedging some of their long position and the naked short position is miniscule. You probably know this and try to deflect attention from the reality that the game will soon be over.Yes a few of us have a small short position which I could really care less about because it will never be large enough given the illiquid market in this company, to make $ much on. Exposing this $90 million fantasy is really all we're about now. 81 weeks to Year 2000 and DEATHWATCH continues.

To: Juraj (Yuri) Krajci who wrote (1138)	6/16/1998 3:26:00 PM
From: Ruyi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1654

Juraj.If longs"nervous" as you say why12,000 sh.bid at$8.00 not hit yesterday? Why are shorts so desperate to hold under $8.50? Why have informed shorts been trying to cover lately? Lastly why are you so spooked?

To: Juraj (Yuri) Krajci who wrote (1138)	6/16/1998 4:19:00 PM
From: Crandell Addington	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1654

"Controlled obscurity" (your words) is what all persons who wish to conceal their true identity strive for. Those of us who contribute to this thread can make our own judgments as to the motive for this concealment. Since you have chosen to give me the moniker "Marmaduke", I choose to give you the moniker "The minnow with a mouth". Now, you have done the political tango of attempting to divert the direct question to focus on another subject. Answer the questions I posed in my last post. I believe that you have made a purposeful misstatement of the facts by stating that English is not your "first" language. Does this mean that English is not the language that you heard at your grandmother's knee, or does it mean that English was not the language that you were educated in? I think that a cursory examination of your postings listed under your personal profile will reveal that English is indeed your "first" language, and that your direct denial under previous postings is a misstatement of the facts. An attempt to create the PERCEPTION that your name made you deficient in English would have been a perfectly acceptable tactical deception. Your apparent direct misstatement strikes me as a fraud. Answer the previously posed questions about you and your "company" or are you truly sitting before a quote server that reveals the complete market depth? If you are, that probably makes you an associate of some member of the VSE. Now what could your motive be then for your opinions? I notice that your syncophant J.D.R. has peeped up again. I'm just sure that people are harassing his family over his foolish opinions about any subject. We all take notice that you and J.D.R. cannot raise $5,000 at very favorable odds to "steal" $10,000 for a children's charity. On second thought, I might decide to call you a "top water minnow". Regards to Yuri the Mysterious Marmaduke