Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aleta who wrote (8983)	6/16/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Please read again what I wrote. I think you misinterpreted what I said. Thanks. For example, where in my post did I say shareholders have a RIGHT to drive the price up. I remind you that a "vested interest" is different than a "right to do." Don't make me sound so negative or wrong--I'm not! Now I'm accusing you of putting words in my mouth! (LOL) Now, when you said "I don't think anyone's motives should be the point of any discussion," here is exactly how I responded. NOTE: I remind you that we were talking about why Jon Tara comments the way he does, without owning any of the stock. But Aleta, what if someone's motive is only to drive the price down? Sure you can answer that someone may well have a motive to drive the price up, but the likelihood of this is that the person owns the stock and therefore has a vested interest in seeing the stock price go up. But what of one who does not own the stock and who only wants to see the price of the stock go down. Yes, then we should--and rightfully so--question an individual's motive. Don't you agree?