SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bill maghan who wrote (13618)6/16/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: mark silvers  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20681
 
Bill

I have no idea what your credentials are, but I will certainly take Paul Blumberg's and CPMs viewpoint that it is a std fire assay. Since they are experts and have viewed the process in person, I will take their word on it.

Mark



To: bill maghan who wrote (13618)6/16/1998 3:41:00 PM
From: Larry Macklin  Respond to of 20681
 
bill,
obviously you have no idea of what you are talking about. The mining industry has guidelines for what can and can not be considered as SFA by the mining community....why dont you call jeff christian at CPM and ask him if its SFA. This is my last post to you because you are stating things as fact when you have no idea what truth is! There is no way to repsond to your irrational line of thinking.

Larry Macklin



To: bill maghan who wrote (13618)6/16/1998 11:35:00 PM
From: GlobalMarine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
The only thing that is "standard" about fire assay is that one utilizes furnace heat in the determination of the amount of PMs in a sample; this is why it is best to leave out the "standard" and just call it "fire assay."