Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RAY BARBER who wrote (812)	6/16/1998 4:25:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Ray: Take a look at the IBUY thread. This activity is strikingly similar to what TRAV is up to. See the Millberg Weiss Class Action Lawsuit against Waldron/Wedbush/IBUY. Item 3: Wedbush used illegal above market buy-ins to dissuade short sellers from their normal course of business" Call Millberg Weiss in San Diego. Or, perhaps the fellow "Arcane Lore" on SI can track it down. See other lawsuits for the same company for even more similarities. Have a lawyer explain the patent situation to you, I have given you all too much information for you not to understand. TRAV has gone in writing on nothing, neither has AENG: no research reports, no financials. See IBUY regarding the SEC market manipulation and resulting trading halt. Ray, I am trying to be patient, of course I am a doubting Thomas, but I am laying sufficient evidence in front of your nose. Just because TRAV recorded the calls does not mean he did something legal. Again, this type of behavior is unnecessary in a legitimate stock. There are also some things here that TRAV has done that have been alluded to here and they are serious allegations. He knows what he did on Friday, how he reversed it yesterday and what he did today. If the heat wasn't on why did he do today's buy in at the legal price (within the days-trading range) of 18 & 1/2 instead of 21? (10,500 shares) Note that on Friday the stock closed at 17 & 1/16 and the buy ins occurred at 21. Why, if he was allowed to do them at 21 when the stock is at 17 &1/16, would he do the buyin at 18 &1/2 today when he "could" have done it at 21? Think about it, before you listen to TRAV's lies. He has been exposed and the heat is on! That is the only reason.

To: RAY BARBER who wrote (812)	6/16/1998 10:22:00 PM
From: 246810	Respond to of 3383

I belive the topic of this thread in the absence of Greg (is Greg the first to be suspended from his own thread?) (another list for Brad to publish) is how not to get caught in an opined swindle, and if you go short how not to get forced to buy to cover at too high a price. Since in my opinion this is a GT0 stock, there is lots to learn here until Greg returns. TO ALL: Wow, Mickey that is a great site. How do you get to it from yahoo.com? Who are all these insiders and how did they get to be insiders? By the way, you file a 144 after you sell the shares, right? You don't have to announce to the world you are planning to do it, right? TO RAY: You said, " When the short sellers had to cover their short position, they went to a number of market makers to cover their position, also known as a buy in." I am really lost in this whole process. The stock was dropping on Friday. Why did the shorts HAVE to cover? What was the effect of the call for real delivery mentioned by Auric? Why did no one have any shares? Travis must have tons. Obviously someone got stung having to buy at 21 (later changed to 18), but why? 246810