To: DrVee who wrote (13533 ) 6/16/1998 7:35:00 PM From: RocketMan Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 50264
>>>>FOOD FOR THE THOUGHTLESS>>.>>>>>>>> >>A physician friend of mine asked me to post this message on his behalf since he hasn't signed up yet with SI to post....<< RM: Oh, yeah, that's really credible :-) >>What if this whole DGIV thing was a hoax all along.... in fact the biggest scam the Internet commerce has yet known?<< RM: What if they set up offices in Santa Monica, offices in Las Vegas, offices in Russia, in Indonesia, in Australia, etc, independent accountants in LA, all of which can be called, just to cover their little hoax. >>What if this stock was hyped by 3-4 insiders who stand to benefit a great deal from driving up the stock price? RM: What if those insiders are so stupid they held their shares all the way down from 8 to 4 without selling a single share. >>What if DGIV has no real plans to be listed on NASDAQ.. for obvious reasons? RM: What if you are worried abut such a listing, for obvious reasons? >>What if DGIV has no real contracts with any of the countries it names in its PR releases.... at least none that anyone has or can verify? RM: What if a lot of us have called to verify that, and you havent? >>What if DGIV doesn't have the technology that it claims to have.... or least none that anyone has actually seen? RM: What if some of us have seen and used the Unix-based Gateways with 43:1 voice compression sitting in their facilities? >>What if DGIV's revenues were generated primarily from selling plain old telephone equipment ? RM: What if the leading VoIP authority includes DGIV gateways in their list of vendors? >>What if the news releases were engineered by DGIV's PR firm to hype the stock..... and that there is no real basis for any of that info? RM: What if this post was engineered by a shorter to bring the stock down ... and that there is no real basis for any of this info? >>What if DGIV didn't make the $ 0.02 /share it claims to have made last year particularly since these aren't audited numbers? RM: What if audited financials show that they made more than that in the first quarter? >>What if the FBI is now hot on the trail of these insiders who have been hyping this stock ? RM: What if the SEC is now hot on the trail of those shorters who have been bashing this stock? Don't ask me, I am just posing some questions... I got these from a doctor friend of mine :-)