Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Arcon Energy (MIDL Presently) The Ultimate Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (3872)	6/16/1998 6:43:00 PM
From: Dusty	Respond to of 4142

Perhaps, but the Patents and whom ever owns them ARE the deal. <EOM>

To: Ga Bard who wrote (3872)	6/16/1998 7:13:00 PM
From: Randi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

Hey Gary, haven't seen this question asked: If Dan Fisher did indeed clean out the checking account, how did he do it? Aren't (weren't) there any checks and balances on the checks/transfer authorizations to prevent this sort of thing, such as "requiring two signatures" or "requiring two officers" to make any sort of transactions over $50,000(just an example). Just kinda wondering if the bank is liable in any way. If no one has asked this, then ask the new President next time you speak with him. Thanks, Randi

To: Ga Bard who wrote (3872)	6/16/1998 11:45:00 PM
From: Whitetigr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

Gary or anyone else that might know. First, what role here does the casualty insurer that was mentioned in the past press release play? Also with Spriggs and Midland being in "friendly" negotiations I am a bit at a loss here. If I am understanding this situation here the word is that Spriggs and the inventor have the 144 patent, not Arcon. But we had Spriggs acting as an agent of Arcon on this deal for rights that Arcon had not acquired? In such case even if a deal had been made with Arcon and in fact only Spriggs and the inventor had the rights to such patent he (Spriggs) would have had to know the whole time that there was a deal made or trying to be made with Arcon for something that Arcon did not have rights to in any case. This would give the impression that if Spriggs does have the rights to the patent in any way shape or form that Midl would have a right to go after it. almost feel like I've been following the ball around the table to see which cup it will be under in the end. Thanks