Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TPII - Year 2000 (Y2K); Groupware; Client Server Migration -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ice Cube who wrote (7683)	6/16/1998 9:03:00 PM
From: JOHN IACOVACCI	Respond to of 10903

Sorry you feel that way. I've read the 37 page sec filing and I can see their were some not so great stock deals going on the last couple of years. This distrubed me and Paul said it was necessary to stay in business. I have been reading a lot about this float here and these worries are real. If this was a sure bet I'd be ordering a porche right now but we've all got to wait and see what kind of revenues and deals come out of these products and hopefully they can support the shares that are out their. We are still in a candian BB stock and not MSFT. So its high risk, high reward. P.S. you can pull the filing off msinvestor.

To: Ice Cube who wrote (7683)	6/17/1998 2:50:00 AM
From: Pierre Mondieu	Respond to of 10903

Ice--any thoughts on this Y2k computer thingy that we keep reading about in the papers?

To: Ice Cube who wrote (7683)	6/17/1998 9:27:00 AM
From: Pierre Mondieu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10903

"I wouldn't (want Paul Mighton on my team)"--Hey Ice Cube, what do you know of Paul Mighton? You accurately point out that the company issued cheap stock in the past, but who do you think had the MOST to lose? Mighton, Mcgee (CFO), McCann (EVP), and Stepanoff (VP). That's right, before the issuance of stock that you've referred to, they owned 47% of the common. Now they own "only" 38%. How companies do you know of where insiders own 38% of the common stock? And in addition, they collectively pay themselves $29,000 a month. How can you attack the integrity of this management team, where they choose to pay themselves an average of $7500/month and own 38% of the stock? For that matter, how can you make judgements about TPI management, when in your Silicon Investor self-ascribed bio, you list as your favorite www.goregallery.com, which has real photographs of real suicide and murder victims, amongst other heinous crap? I understand that technicals are important in the price of a stock, but so are fundamentals. If you can lay off goregallery long enough, try www.year2000.com for awhile, and catch a clue as to what is really going on in the IT Services industry in which TPI participates.