Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (35081)	6/16/1998 11:41:00 PM
From: TREND1	Respond to of 53903

LT Tom brings the "carrot" back into the MU trading equation. (1) Fear for the bears. (2) Carrot for the bulls. (3) Lot's of up and down for the traders.... Larry Dudash

To: Lucretius who wrote (35081)	6/16/1998 11:46:00 PM
From: TREND1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

LT You wrote this on June 12, 1998 <<I don't believe it. MU is taking on water and going down fast by the bow, and the bulls are still hangin out at the bar, listening to music and joking around. If I were long this stock, I'd be firing up flares hoping someone would save form my lack of intelligence, but that's just me? Its going to get alot worse from here. >>> LT I guess some one saw the flares Larry Dudash

To: Lucretius who wrote (35081)	6/16/1998 11:47:00 PM
From: Wolfgangus	Respond to of 53903

LT- Thanks for the real text from Kurly, although I always thought Moe was "the best there is". I too believe MU is trying to give the shorts another chance. I also wouldn't be surprised to see Kurly come out with a "clarification" on Thursday or (as someone mentioned his favorite) Friday before expiration that would name stocks to avoid for now. Wish I could see his brokerage statement to see if he was long or short MU June options. I shorted MU at 27 3/8 rode it up to 38, barely held my lunch down, and am still short. Target 17, but I know it could see 30 before that. After all it is such a bargain! Wolfgangus

To: Lucretius who wrote (35081)	6/17/1998 1:02:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 53903

>>"Why investors chose to ignore the industry's weak fundamentals last winter can only be blamed on a bull market psychology hoping for a quick recovery."<< boy, i hate to say it, but tom may be reading this thread ;-) that is exactly what i said when mu spiked up. mu management played the game and gave the dim-bulls false hope with their korean inventory proclamation. it was false and was called such by da bears. in a stretch of absurd cognitive dissodence (sp?), i bet david agrees with tom and disagrees with me when we are saying the same thing ;-) but, hey, my leaping ability "tracks" michael jordan's so i'm happy ;-)