Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : BANDORE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Guy Paquin who wrote (1249)	6/17/1998 10:06:00 PM
From: Benfica	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1692

You have an interesting point of view. I believe Buffet will hold silver for the long term. He does not buy things for a quick buck. I still think that he is waiting for something big to happen and I think gold will follow. I think one of the reasons he did not buy gold would be the price. He can make much more money if silver doubles then if gold goes up to $500. I also agree silver is more widely used. I think companies like Kodak would have protected themselves from somebody cornering the market. I have not heard anyone in history who has ever cornered the silver market. I could be wrong about that. I think with commodies going down for the last couple of years it is interested why he would buy silver.