Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (58157)	6/17/1998 10:52:00 AM
From: denni	Respond to of 186894

here is wsj's view of the ftc vs. intel: interactive.wsj.com!BT06/17++1190!WJ06/17+++195!BT06/16++4214!&time=06/17+09:44 How Intel's Good Deeds Get Punished "Why would Intergraph risk valuable cooperation with Intel over a moot patent issue? Because the company sadly had already locked itself into a losing strategy, trying to sell fancy workstations against a tide of cheaper PCs. It hasn't made a profit since 1992, and regularly bleeds $70 million or so a year. Why not try to salvage something with a lawsuit?"

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (58157)	6/17/1998 10:56:00 AM
From: Paul Fiondella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

The question is what is Intel up to? Not who are they in bed with. I would think you Celery fans would at least have learned something by now from my posts about digging out Intel's marketing strategy. Instead what I see is a continuation of the outdated big chip we're a monopoly scumbag philosophy coming back at me from the likes of you. Measuring CPU speed isn't where it is at Jimbo. And I suggested an Intel Novell alliance a long time ago here and got the typical idiot responses. Try thinking for a change, it might help your portfolio.