Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aleta who wrote (9054)	6/17/1998 11:58:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

Aleta, you said "a lot of their past PR was proven to be incorrect." What's the definition of "a lot?" There was a clarification with DEC And wasn't that DEC announcement similar to what you're calling for now? Nonetheless the correction was timely. And what happened here is not at all uncommon to any company. Then there was the clarification on the Universal deal, right smack dab in the middle of the SIM acquisition. I agree, that was corrected in an untimely manner. But the SIM situation created mitigating circumstances. Given what we now know to be very confusing and problem-plagued elements of the SIM deal, is it any wonder that a correction on the Universal release, concerning Tom Burgess' friend and colleague Charles Rose at Universal, could slip by the wayside? I mean formally or not, Mr. Burgess and Mr. Rose were working together. They always have worked together. They probably didn't see it as a problem, given the magnitude of problems that had to be dealt with at SIM. What else comprises "a lot," other than the above? Additionally, there is, in fact, a new PR firm. And thus far, it's charged to release information regarding new hires, a new executive team. Indeed, product endorsements and technology breakthroughs and partnerships, etc. will surely come. Now, Aleta, why take a crack at something that doesn't at this time need to be cracked at? Are you really so critical? I'm getting hints of your behavior again. Is it that maybe you want to buy some more in the .20's? Well, thanks a lot. I just bought some more at .34. Let the company move through its phases. You can't be like a horse pulling a wagon, be or yelling from the sidelines at the horse pulling the wagon. Just hop on the wagon and go for the ride, and let the driver speak to the horse. Name the horse Hayton, if you want! Stop trying to create a whole new argument. And you said you think I like to argue? Check the mirror. But I assure you, if you begin arguing while doing that, you'll both lose and win. Sorta like Zulu's doing. (LOL)

To: aleta who wrote (9054)	6/17/1998 12:03:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Aleta, you said: "I believe they even had to rescind a statement about a contract with DEC that didn't actually happen." No, it's not that the deal didn't go down. Put your memory cap on. What the problem was, is that the deal was done with a DEC subsidiary, and the DEC name got used too liberally in the press release. The second release, the correction, properly emphasized the deal was with the subsidiary. All small companies make it look like they know and play with the big companies. Again, this was a common mistake and promptly corrected. No big deal! And to Jon Tara: When the company reported the revenues it made, you didn't believe 'em anyway. So what's the use. You're going to be negative up and down the line.