Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink..(PNLK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glen Abbey who wrote (7076)	6/17/1998 2:33:00 PM
From: Warren A. Wilbur, Jr.	Respond to of 8242

Did you guys notice several large buys at 'high' ask price >seems as if the MM's shake stock out at low price and than pass it along at 'high' ask price, anyone with level II and more insight ?? thanks

To: Glen Abbey who wrote (7076)	6/17/1998 2:54:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8242

Glenn: Well stated. Why this person hasn't taken the time to contact the company to voice his concerns and desires concerning the site is perplexing. I myself have had my doubts about the company, especially after the WSJ article. But rather than come on the thread, I addressed my concerns and doubts to the company first. I didn't come up with excuses not to do so. I got answers from the company that satified my concerns I have also critiqued the company's marketing a product before it was ready and have gone so far as to call Mr. Zagoren naive. Again I have forwarded these thoughts to PNL and Zagoren, and am satisfied that PNL and Zagoren have learned from their mistakes and are waiting to market PNL until the website is done with its PHASE 2 development. This latest person to come on and make blanket statements has completely ignored some of the genuine constructive criticism that has been raised on this thread and is much appreciated. He makes some very absurb comments regarding how criticism is received by members of this thread. If he had made comments after speaking with Proxicom, PNL, Zagoren, and cited(and listed the names) a number of other businesses he had spoken to that feel the same way he does, then I'd be more responsive to his critique. If he had refrained from making Draconian comments about PNL's viabilty, I'd not find his motivations so transparent. One interesting note regarding his comments, is to note that "his company" (what is the name of his company, and its phone number) has canceled its membership prior to the end of the trial. Anyone who has been on as a trial member realizes that as trial member your access to the searches is limited. Why he didn't note this, I do not know? Anyway, as I stated before and as others have also done so too, especially after only fours weeks, no one can make blankets statements regarding PNL viability either way. To do so isn't only premature, it is immature. I for one remain long because they are adding the services to their cited that they said they would. ztect -spelling not checked

To: Glen Abbey who wrote (7076)	6/17/1998 3:18:00 PM
From: Muzzy	Respond to of 8242

I have been following this thread for more than a month. I originally bought in at 1.75 then again at 3.25. Since I'm really in for a long term investment, I have enjoyed re ading this thread with what I hope is a distant objectivity. A part of me is amused by andevron's (bull in a china shop) form of destructive criticism,in as much as we all know the ulterior motive.I'm sorry for those of you that had been hoping for short term gains, but for those looking far down the road, this is an opportunity to strengthen your position, relax, and enjoy the ride. I have invested into the concept, and the reputation of the people who founded this company.