SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andrew Furst who wrote (10292)6/17/1998 5:34:00 PM
From: The Duke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13594
 
AT&T's assets aren't significantly greater than Sprint's, yet AT&T's market cap is more
than 3 times Sprint's market cap. The difference of course is "brand name", i.e. AT&T
has more customers - but not because of a better or cheaper service, simply a lack of
knowledge by the public that telecom is a commodity - eventually AT&T's "brand
value" will fade, with the advent of a more sophisticated public.


substitute aol for T and earhlink for sprint in the above quote and what changes? How can you be bullish on AOL and then use "brand name" in scare quotes? Seems like you logic on T cuts tenfold on AOL.



To: Andrew Furst who wrote (10292)6/17/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: J.S.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13594
 
You make a good point. Indeed, I think it is pretty clear that
you could do much better with $30B of hard currency than buying AOL.
As someone just mentioned on the AMZN thread, as soon as such an offer
was made ATT stock would plummet along with the proposed offering.

For $30B cash, Case would cash in before you could say "extraordinary
earnings, capital gains from sale of stock, and net operating loss
carryover". That would make him one of the richest men in the world.
Running AOL would be small potatoes.

Please keep in mind that the only thing we know is that the
London Times reported that "One person told them that the offer
would be ..."