SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yikes who wrote (10293)6/17/1998 5:45:00 PM
From: J.S.  Respond to of 13594
 
Yikes,
There is no doubt you are right. The only plausible rejoinder concerns
the brand name (mentioned by Sam). However there is a very good reply.
AMERICA on line has limited appeal in a worldwide market. With
all that in cash, I would rather build the brand name of ATT Worldnet
which does not suffer from this limitation.

Also keep in mind that any such deal would have to be a stock swap.
There is no way that ATT could get its hand on 25 or 30 Billion
dollars.

On second thought in this crazy market where AMZN could float
their "senior debt" at 10% and get away with it, anything is possible.

See Ya,
Joe



To: Yikes who wrote (10293)6/17/1998 11:22:00 PM
From: P.T.Burnem  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13594
 
if AT&T wants to, it could use that $25B to offer FREE INTERNET dail-up to ALL of its long distance subscribers. By year end, it will have over 50 million subscribers in America.

For $25B AT&T could produce and distribute a better soft drink then Coca Coca, but how many people would actually buy it?

Just like Coca Cola, America Online is a dominant brand, and brands sell themselves. Some ISP's already offer free (advertisement-supported) Internet access. So what?

PTB

P.S. Don't get me wrong. I tried America Online once, and it sucked. In addition, it took me three months to wean AOL off my credit card. I hate the company, but I love the stock.