SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Clarksterh who wrote (20539)6/17/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: Ramsey Su  Respond to of 70976
 
Clark,

my sentiments exactly on the Y2K problem. I suspect that everything was blamed on El Nino a few months ago. Now Asia is taking the heat. Starting in the near future, all we are going to hear about is Y2K Y2k.

There is so much material available about Y2K on the net now that I can spend 2000 yrs reading and still won't catch up. So far, I have seen optmistic opinions but I have yet to see any company who claims that they have the problem solved, or even a solution, or even quantified data showing how it may not be a problem.

the only good news I see out of the Y2K issue is the demise of the IRS. They are apparently so far behind in just trying to catch up on the 1997 tax law changes that they pretty much have given up hope on Y2K. There is nothing more that I would like as a yr 2000 present as the total failure of the IRS computer system.

Ramsey



To: Clarksterh who wrote (20539)6/17/1998 6:12:00 PM
From: Ian@SI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
Clark, ***OT***Y2K,

Fully agree with each statement made.

UPRR was on the leading edge of cleaning up their systems about 4 years ago. It's likely that they're in pretty good shape from a Y2K perspective. Now if they could only run a railroad. :-)

So, when is it going to be a priority?

Answer # 1: When the incumbent maintenance manager realizes, he'll still be in the job when the systems come crashing down around his ears. Then, the problems will be prevented. This, is at best, a partial solution applying to a small %age of systems.

Answer # 2: New systems are usually Y2K capable. If not, time for the "chain-saw" approach to staff motivation.



To: Clarksterh who wrote (20539)6/17/1998 6:27:00 PM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
OFF TOPIC
Y2K problems have already hit some doctors here in Louisiana. They upgraded the Medicare payments server to be Y2K compliant, but some of the doctors' systems weren't. The server wouldn't accept data from non-compliant clients, so some doctors haven't been paid their Medicare money for over a month. Maybe Y2K is closer than we think.