Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : NTN Communications, worth 185 million? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JAMES F. CLASPILL III who wrote (2574)	6/18/1998 10:25:00 AM
From: dwight vickers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2985

Well, Sue. Then I guess you better read this one too. Hopefully my "mole" Randall (or is he me??) will get to read it, since he doesn't read the Yahoo board. From the e-mail he sent me it appears he's as confused at being accused, as I suspect everyone who read the original e-mail was. Everyone except me that is! I giggled for days. messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com What tangled webs we weave when we (Classpill) practice to deceive! Dwight

To: JAMES F. CLASPILL III who wrote (2574)	6/18/1998 8:19:00 PM
From: RP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2985

To All: The following relates to the "Randall" discussion involving Mr. James Claspill and Mr. Dwight Vickers. --------- I have been in NTN for about 2 years. When Mr. Claspill offered to send email updates articulating his opinion I signed up and have received his notes for quite some time. Though I never looked at the mailing list all that closely I believe I was the only Randall on the list. I recently received an email from Mr. Claspill regarding my (i.e., Randall) contact with Mr. Vickers. He sent me the entire Yahoo post #1655 by Mr. Vickers as his source. an excerpt: James F. Claspill III wrote: > > Dwigth claims you are passing on the information. See the below > post. > He made it public, I did not. > > Well you got me. I'm "Sanjay" and Randall is helping me to uncover > your "secrets". --------------- I replied as follows: James, Now I'm really scratching my head. If he is referring to me (i.e., rniedz@ao.net) then the above reference is not correct. If he is referring to another Randall then the statement may be correct. I'm not quite sure how you go about unraveling the truth here, but if you have any ideas and I can help just let me know. Randy Niedz --------------- Mr. Claspill's replied (I don't have his message as I am on a different computer) that I should probably explain this on the Yahoo thread. I thought this was reasonable so I contacted Mr. Vickers and asked him if he could indicate that I was not the same Randall that was mentioned in post #1655. He indicated the following: "I'd like to help you out, but Jim started all this himself by accusing you in his e-mail." "I just went along for fun." He indicated that I could post any of our communications. ---------------- All my communications with Mr. Vickers were carboned to Mr. Claspill. Each individual should therefore know what has been happening. Am I the Randall referred to in post #1655? I really don't know since it is not clear to me what is going on. In fact I really don't know up from down right now regarding this whole affair. I rarely read the SI postings or Mr. Vickers letter, and have never read the Yahoo postings. I have never posted anything on the NTN SI or Yahoo threads, have never corresponded with anybody regarding NTN until now, and am ignorant of the issues over which Mr. Claspill and Mr. Vickers disagree. I don't know if this will help clarify anything and I certainly hope it won't make a confusing situation, at least to me, worse. I will post this on the Yahoo thread as well. Randall P. Niedz rniedz@ao.net