Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (58271)	6/18/1998 3:18:00 PM
From: Diamond Jim	Respond to of 186894

RE: "You must know that the past does not guarantee future results" ++++++++++++++ As an AMD investor, you'd better hope not. jim

To: Ali Chen who wrote (58271)	6/18/1998 5:06:00 PM
From: Dale J.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ali, I was under impression that investors in technology sector are somewhat more literate than an average consumer:) Now I see I was wrong. Yes Ali, you are wrong. Intel stock is one of the most widely held stocks. I am going to say it again, because you will probably misconstrue what I said. Intel stock is one of the most widely held stocks. Now did you really think all those stock holders are literate in the chip design issues you seem to relish. Backed with the MS Windows compatibility, they can move independently in the right market. So far it seems that they can do this quicker than Intel. Examples: sub-$1000 PC market, 3D-Now game accelation instructions, integrated MediaGX No Ali, wrong again. Now this is getting humorous. Tell me, do you really believe Intel's lagging in the Sub-1000 PC market was due to technical expertise or was it due to profitablility consideration? Don't worry I will give you the answer. It was due to profitability considerations. Intel looks at everything in terms of profitability, and considers the long view. The head has gone (with his communist-inspired "culture" and discipline) Leave Clinton and the FTC out of this. Seriously pressed for time, I will read the article and come back to this point later time. So far a consumer appears to be even smarter than you... I am a consumer. So you are saying I am smarter than myself? OK. sorry for the "instability". No problem. I'm just glad to see it's treatable with medication. Dale