To: Marq Spencer who wrote (11083 ) 6/18/1998 7:03:00 PM From: Robert Graham Respond to of 14631
This may be a good play. Usually writing current month CALLs allow for the best erosion of time premium. But with this stock unless volatility is unusually high the time premium is virtually non-existant. The speculative public that wants to make a play usually purchases cheap out-of-the-money options. So I am not surprised the volatility is reflected in the 7.5 CALLs which are currently just out-of-the-money. There appears to be a 1/2 point premium on JULY 7.5 and 15/16 on AUG 7.5 CALLs. The OE is 10363 and 4756 respectively, both which is an order of magnitude higher than their 5.0 strike price counterpart. The drawback to writing AUG CALLs is both the time to the contract, which may or may not be a benefit, and the time value erosion occurs much more quickly with the JULY CALLs. As it stands, I do agree that 8 would be an upper limit for the next couple months which would place the option in-the-money by 1/2. So the AUG calls would afford a better buffer. However, watch out for the earnings report date on this stock which can over a short period of time pop the stock temporarily above 8. But the OI for this option should be significant enough to render an exersize on your option only a small possibility unless the earnings report date occurs during option expiration week and you waited to cover until this time period. It is best if the earnings report would come out after the expiration date of your option. Your approach trades some of the potential through volatility of the price of the underlying stock with that of the erosion of time premium. This is because my option is deeper in the money, will trader for closer to a 1:1 following of the price of the stock, and has the additional advantage of profiting from a wider down swing that can be made by the stock. But your approach is much more manageable for the person who has a full time job and other interests, while my approach requires me to stay on top of the price swings in this stock. So even though I may net out a larger profit I would need the volatility to remain and be very good at timing my writes and covers. All considered, I do think your approach is the less risky approach that requires less maintenance of the position. Still, I think this basically comes down to one question. If you think the price of the stock has a good chance to revisit 6 within the next two months, then the writing of the CALL options at the 5 strike price would be a better approach. In this case, the JULY 5 CALL would be the better choice where profit or a more complete hedge is the focus. I would check the date of the next earnings announcement. Comments welcome. Bob Graham