Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (6678)	6/18/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Jan the "short-squeeze" thing has been greatly exaggerated. The shorts would have had to cover about 49 times already to match the level of press they are getting here. Please do a bit of math. Hi Victor, I am sure that you are making valid points and I have to yield to your knowledge and insights if you are right. However, NASDAQ double counts volume and Amzn is really just a trading stock for manyyyyy, me included. But, the concentrated /cohesive effort of the past week by the ???? cannot be all "nature". I guess that after the big boys were forced to return their short shares, they knew that the squeeze/action was imminent and they started to buy calls/shares so they may recover their loss from/during the following squeeze, then others followed...and snow ball began... Well, just my thoughts, feel free to correct. Ty, Jan