SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: opalapril who wrote (6491)6/19/1998 10:30:00 AM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 17367
 
Opala, nice summary of XOMA the stock. Meanwhile, XOMA the company looks interesting. IMO the following article indicates a role for them here not only with their existing TIF patents but also in the most recent humanizing patent.

11:53 AM ET 06/18/98

Transplant drug may offer hope for AIDS -expert


(Release at 4 p.m. EDT (2000 GMT) Thursday)
By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Correspondent
WASHINGTON8 (Reuters) - A drug used on organ transplant
patients may offer a way of eliminating the AIDS virus from the
body, a top researcher said Thursday.
Dr. David Ho, one of the developers of the drug ''cocktail''
approach that has made HIV infection a controllable disease for
many people, said the drug may be able to tease out bits of the
virus that are known to lurk in the body for years.
Ho, of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center at Rockefeller
University in New York, has considerably toned down his early
enthusiasm for the cocktail approach.
When he first announced it could beat the virus down below
detectable levels in the blood, at the 11th International AIDS
Conference in Vancouver in 1996, he thought HIV could be
defeated with a year or two of combination drug therapy.
But although patients taking the three and four drug
combinations stayed well, and showed no sign of infection,
careful tests showed that HIV lingered in their bodies.
Experts like Ho think it hides in resting immune cells --
which are known to lie quiescent in the body for years until
they are needed.
The drugs that attack HIV work against the virus's
replicative process -- so if the virus is quiet, and the cell it
is hiding in is quiet, the drugs cannot work.
Writing in a commentary in the journal Science, Ho said it
is clear that the immune system must be tweaked to activate all
of these cells and flush out the HIV.
Unfortunately, the cells are probably specialized to
recognize a wide array of invaders. ''Thus, administration of a
limited set of antigens is unlikely to activate a sufficient
number of these cells to replicate viruses and thereby
facilitate their rapid death,'' Ho wrote.
Antigens ''flag'' invaders such as viruses and bacteria so
that antibodies, proteins produced by immune cells, can home in
on them.
''What about cytokines?'' Ho asks. Cytokines are immune
system signaling chemicals that can stimulate immune cells.
Using single cytokines such as interleukin-2, or IL-2, would not
work, but mixtures of several such as IL-2, IL-6 and tumor
necrosis factor (TNF) work in test tubes.
Other activators such as bacterial superantigens and a class
of monoclonal antibodies -- proteins that can locate and attach
to a specific cell -- might work, Ho added.
He named specifically a mouse antibody known as OKT3
(muromonab-CD3), used to prevent the body from rejecting kidney
transplants.
''In particular, a mouse CD3 monoclonal antibody, OKT3, is
already a licensed clinical product,'' Ho wrote.
''Relatively high doses of OKT3 are routinely used to
deplete T-cells (immune system cells) to prevent transplant
rejection,'' he added. Low doses could stimulate T-cells.
''Thus, low-dose OKT3 should be judiciously tested not only
to define its safety profile ... but also to determine the
magnitude of T-cell activation achievable without prohibitive
toxicity.''
He said many doses would be needed to flush out HIV-infected
cells, and thus perhaps a human version of OKT3 could be
genetically engineered.
OKT3 is made by Ortho Biotech, a subsidiary of Johnson &
Johnson .
^REUTERS@



To: opalapril who wrote (6491)6/19/1998 10:55:00 AM
From: Robert K.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17367
 
The difference is.............................................................................>>.
>>>true value vs percieved value.
It pays to discover, mark my words.



To: opalapril who wrote (6491)6/20/1998 2:44:00 AM
From: Tharos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17367
 
Great overlay, I would only add one Macro:
Wall Street hates the word "sepsis" and anything to do with it.