Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VAUGHN who wrote (940)	6/20/1998 8:32:00 AM
From: George J. Tromp	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 2251

Thanks Vaughn for your valuable imput in posting this information. Of note in this release., it is significant to note that 1mm sq. mesh screen is the minimum screen size in the 5034 valuation., where as previously they infer there was no previous minimum captured., where the 5.4 carats per ton figure emerged back in 94. Of note as well., is Winspears choice of 1.2mm sq. mesh screen equivalent to 1mmx9mm slotted screen size. Of key importance., most investors should consider., is that the screen size choice is probably reflective of what the company considers will be captured in overal grade. If Monopross is reflecting a 1.81 carat now that the screen size is established at 1mm sq. mesh., it would as well indicate that Winspears choice of 1.2mm sq. mesh equivalent to be more reflective of larger stone distribution throughout the mini-bulk and its grade as well a better mix of larger stones. Sincerely George j. Tromp