SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Worswick who wrote (1604)6/19/1998 11:35:00 AM
From: JPR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12475
 
Worswick:

I respect your ideas as a historian. But I fail to see a cogent logic in your assumption that India has disintegrated virtually and figuratively, in that India has been burdened and divided along linguistic, ethnic, racial, and provincial lines. Unity in diversity, a much used phrase, is the strength that India will thrive on. The pull and push between federal and state Govts are not only healthy, elucidating, enlightening and also a prime example of democracy at work. A unified view between state and federal Govts on a project happens only when there is a concurrence of views between local and central Govts, or more pointedly in a dictatorship.
A military with no political burden or ambition, such as India's, will keep the country together under times of fissiparous tendencies - to use Nehruvian term.

Forgive me for pointing out the following:
Your spelling, syntax, and sentence construction are hurried and need more attention from a self-described historian like you. This is not meant as an insult. I hope that you take this as a constructive suggestion.

<<I won't say sadly that Indiq will "distingrate" >>
<<histoiran>>
<< as a historain of India>>
<<aggessive>>>
<<Maharasthra>>
I won't say sadly that Indiq will "distingrate" I will make the observation that history is history and what happens happens and therefore isn't sad to a histoiran or happy.>>>