Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mike iles who wrote (35443)	6/19/1998 2:18:00 PM
From: TREND1	Respond to of 53903

mike you wrote <<but the $750M saves their bacon for this cycle. >> mike How do you know this ? If you know where the bottom of this cycle is, PLEASE LET US ALL KNOW !!!! Larry Dudash

To: mike iles who wrote (35443)	6/19/1998 5:21:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin	Respond to of 53903

Mike, I disagree. After all the money they supposedly made in the 1991-1996 period, this company should be rolling in cash. Management has squandered cash when they had it in some ill-advised ventures. Only Simplot's deep pockets, a bit of racism, and Lowry's tech expertise has kept them afloat. One strange twist to the TI tale. With all those new shares being issued, losses per share will be somewhat diluted. -g- MB

To: mike iles who wrote (35443)	6/19/1998 8:18:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

>>given what's happened in DRAM in the last couple of years, it's a credit to them that they're still alive. << mike, mu has had 2 bad qs following many, many, many, many qs of unreal eps and a few qs where they were breakeven.. saying that a company has been led excellently when they have 2 bad qs following 4 years of immense profitability. at least according to the income statement, is a little bit too thick. my question is... where the h*ll did all the money go? ;-)