SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Czechsinthemail who wrote (5924)6/19/1998 3:48:00 PM
From: Will Lyons  Respond to of 10921
 
fellow bottomfishers

equip sales supposedly recover after chips so how about ATMI which sells consumables as well as equipment and I believe the ratio is about three to one so they should continue to remain in the black and they have about 80 million cash and equivalents. Comments and/or or criticism welcome
Will



To: Czechsinthemail who wrote (5924)6/19/1998 3:49:00 PM
From: William Nelson  Respond to of 10921
 
klic's main competition is Japanese I think...adding in the
latest awful warning, I don't think klic is through suffering.



To: Czechsinthemail who wrote (5924)6/19/1998 6:54:00 PM
From: Rob-Chemist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10921
 
I like PLAB and DPMI, followed by ASYT. The mask makers have not been, and would seem unlikely to be, significantly affected by reduced selling prices for chips and the Asian problems. In fact, they might even be helped by the decreased chip prices. If decreased chip prices "encourage" chip manufacturers to develop new chips that can be manufactured at a lower cost, this will result in the need for more new mask sets since each new version of a chip will generally need a completely new set of masks. In last quarters earnings reports (PLAB = $0.30/share and DPMI = $0.50/share (diluted, after extraordinary items), these two companies as well as MASK ($0.34/share) all said that they had not been negatively affected by the goings on in the rest of the chip industry. Of PLAB and DPMI, I think that I favor DPMI since their year-year growth was significantly greater than DPMI (and, suprisingly, MASK had a growth rate even higher than PLAB). An additional trend that should benefit these companies is that more and more semi manufacturers are contracting out for masks, rather than designing them in-house.

I like ASYT since they have a virtual monopoly in SMIF (see various posts by A. Vance), and their technology significantly decreases the cost of chip manufacturing.

I find ETEC very tempting. However, I am slightly more wary of them because of potential competition on the horizon (UTEK, Leica (I think), and I think there is also a Japanese company in this area). Presently they have a very strong technology and are the dominant player in this area (probably in a position equivalent to that of AMAT in front end equipment).

I do not find KLIC particularly compelling at this level since I have no idea how much excess capacity presently exists in the assembly area.



To: Czechsinthemail who wrote (5924)6/19/1998 11:57:00 PM
From: ET  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10921
 
baird.......you should be checking out Veeco .....[veco].....