Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (6812)	6/19/1998 3:46:00 PM
From: Henry Wolfond	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

After suffering through the last 2 weeks on the wrong side of this stock, I began to console myself by wondering what ever happened to Clam Clam?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (6812)	6/19/1998 3:55:00 PM
From: F The	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

Insane. $75 3/4.

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (6812)	6/19/1998 10:02:00 PM
From: Paul Merriwether	Respond to of 164684

Glenn On the topic of MF and their iom touting, looks like its coming to an end. This following from the MF site. I don't know how they justify holding amzn in their portfolio. I can understand mo traders with the quick draws and fingers on the trigger holding on long to amzn, but I don't think such is the case with the MF. Also, btw, I am considering shorting iom. Their prospects truly stink and I think I can make a good %age gain. I think I might research them some... << One interesting note should be made that Iomega, once owning the largest portion of the Fool Portfolio, is now only the seventh-largest stock of the fourteen positions held. Yup, our old super-star player has gone from batting clean up to flirting with being a benchwarmer. So far, it's only a good thing that half of the position was sold last year at a price exactly 40% higher than today's. Another interesting thought: Just think, calling a stock "The Next Iomega" may actually now carry a negative connotation. Who woulda thunk it? >>