Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (5410)	6/19/1998 4:32:00 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Hi Elizabeth. I don't think anyone really disagrees with what you have said in this post. Certainly "the collective we" of CRN and DML threads have reeped the wrath of Cannacrap and Yorkton. I think the only disagreement here is the forecast of .25c It seems most threads prefer .20c decrements, and when it reaches that decrement than a further prediction of .20c is acceptable!<gggg> There is a general belief that there are "significant shareholders" monitoring the thread, so uttering .25c could cause a run for the gates. I am not of that belief. I think probably 3-5% of shareholders are aware of SI. This also leads me to my pet peeve. I believe that SI should be a closed forum for members only. That way Flemming and his "nimrods" from the TSE can't watch postings on SI and decide to launch "suit" against deflammatory statments. Nauseate SI owners requesting a secure forum for threads!! I realize you may have concern for Ed Pakstas, but there needn't be. He's just like the rest of us, losin our shirts!!,<gg> Besides, he's received a significant complement and boost to his "stock prowess" of late....... he was accused of being me. <GGGGGGGGGgggggggggggahahahahahahaha..har-har!!! the Chief