SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tonto who wrote (48539)6/19/1998 4:32:00 PM
From: RBM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
Tonto,

Martin may be great at that, but he/she/it didn't try to get jack here as far as I know. If he/she/it did, he/she/it has the worst way of presenting it, period. Then you have Martin fostering this indecent "I told you so" attitude that is down right ignorant. Did I go over to NETZ and continually rub it in anyones face, NO. Infact I don't know as if I have ever seen martin do anything except badmouth a stock, not that I follow martin around anywhere. This concept could/would/should work, the problem is there are to many people looking to benefit from the decent people, and then poor follow thru hampers it even more. What you really need to effect a squeeze is about 50 to 100 people, who are committeed A) to the company and its future, B) Have deep pocket (and I do mean DEEP) C) Don't get scared when the MM's are playing there games. I still find it ironic that in the beginning the nays said that most of the illegal naked shorting never happened.... I do honestly believe that MK was one saying that... and then out of nowhere that Billion dollars reared its ugly head.. I know you have read it, (I am assuming a bit much here, but your obious experience on this market leads me there) so what it that settlement telling you? It tells me EVERY GOSH FOR SAKEN MM has screwed you, me and everyone else here, and it was illegal. The Billion dollars is just a way they can continue to do it. Gotta love this country. I do believe I got into OVIS for the right reason.. for the squeeze... No, not to become a millionaire, although it would have been nice :-), but to stand as a united front against this BULLSHIT. What do you think of this for a concept? You have about 3 million dollars. Find a company with a float under 2 million, that is trading under .20 cents. (there are plenty of them.) You continue this by talking to the company and get to know the ceo and the business... over time. When you decide the time is right, or the company, you start buying shares... small blocks, maybe 20,000 or 30,000 a day, until you own the float. Even if you avg .50 cents, you will still own the float. and then you can make a masssive attack with the rest of your capital. Now if you have the float tied up, and you make a massive attack on the market, say 100,000 shares plus, they will sell it to you. They will try and shake shares lose to get, and drop the price and short the whole time by selling you shares they don't have.
Of course you won't sell and eventually they will be screwed. Now I know you would have to register your holdings, but it doesn't matter, if you own everything, they will have no choice... calling for the float in one big certificate, hell call for more then the float, that would be a hoot! I think you get my point. They will sell sell sell, because they know they can induce selling... what happens when you own EVERYTHING and then some, no worrying about anyone else getting cold feet, just you... We know what happens, MM goes bankrupt, heck maybe 2 or 3... or they have to meet YOUR price. Simple Supply and Demand. Sorry to be so long winded. Hopefully someday, this is what I will do for a living. The SEC and NASD are not going to do anything about it. I think honestly catching FSCO sleeping would be like finding an oasis in the desert... and them pockets are deep.

Rob



To: tonto who wrote (48539)6/19/1998 7:42:00 PM
From: Angel D  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
tonto,

I hate to say it, but your recommendation of s martin reminds me very much of the PM's I have gotten from MK.

From my point of view, all that I have ever seen from s martin is that he /she/it is very good at linking and referring to past posts. I have never seen any example where s martin has gotten information from a company. All I have ever seen is s martin picking apart the posts of others and referring to their , or someone else's , past posts.

tonto, I'm sorry to say it but, your post and the PM's I have received from MK regarding s martin make me believe that there is something going on here.

Best regards,

AD



To: tonto who wrote (48539)6/20/1998 12:28:00 AM
From: Pugs  Respond to of 55532
 
Ah ha!
I heard! He's got "informants" y'know? ....and yeah. I saw your post where you 'vouched' for a guy who posts anonymously....hmmmm, informants, vouching for 'anonymous' posters......

>>>>....your statement clearly identifies a major error in your reasoning. This
explains for some of your mistakes:>>>>>>>

I can 'identify' a 'major error' in your reasoning.....you have me confused with someone who gives a (edit).

Pugs