Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : James Cramer Skeptic Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WTMHouston who wrote (216)	6/20/1998 3:50:00 AM
From: taxikid	Respond to of 1254

legaleze? repudiate is what some do when there are facts, hints, allegations or things "said" that merely question a certain hedge fund guy's actions. i am not alluding to anyone or anything here...(or am i?) you will have to base your own opinions on conclusion drawn from my abstract thoughts.. unless of course you can read between the lines? ___________________________________________________________ j\|c\| c\|a\|n\| d\|i\|s\|h\| i\|t o\|u\|t, b\|u\|t c\|a\|n\|'\|t t\|a\|k\|e i\|t ___________________________________________________________ the unconscionable treatment of anyone who questions the prudency of certain equity transactions is quite appalling. I am personally fed up with the threatening undertones of this thread and will of course save every post, so i have a record. FOR THE RECORD. I am a firm believer in our constitutional rights. specifically the ones that allow "the hated one" to publish and speak his mind. What's good for the follicly challenged is good for the barber shop impaired. taxi- something or other.

To: WTMHouston who wrote (216)	6/20/1998 3:08:00 PM
From: N. David Lessani	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1254

Reply to WTMHOUSTON: Dear Sir/Madam : With all due respect you got my points wrong for the following reason : I did not use "fraud" . I said he promotes his positions. He has the right to promote his hedge fond LONGS . We also have the right to say he is biased ih his opinion when he is LONG or badmouth the stocks he is SHORTS. Whether on not I have INSIDE INFORMATION, YOU SHOULD KNOW AT THE END OF HIS ARTICLE at thestreet.com he write he has position in those stocks in his hedge fund or he writes he like to short this or that. This is public information you should be aware of. You and I when We either LONG or SHORT , We have no thestreet.com to promote our position. He does have You and I cannot go to CNBC to state our reasons why we are long or short a stock, He does have this luxury. IMHO, He should separate his interest in his hedge fund from thestreet.com which has journalistic value in order to preserve the ingerity of thestreet.com .