Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SEEC, Inc. (SEEC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ratan lal who wrote (501)	6/20/1998 3:47:00 AM
From: Steve Woas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1031

Ratan, You say: ". You tell me WHY it sis undervalued. What do you see that the others not willing to pay a higher price have missed. Why is SEEC better than any other Y2K co. ?? Why have people not recognized the value of SEEC?" What is it with you? I have already answered those questions. Check out the PEG numbers. Now, why would it not surprise me that you are unaware of PEG? All anyone has to do to confirm that your posts are negative on SEEC is to pull up your last 6 to 8 post on this thread. Y2Kly yours, Steve

To: ratan lal who wrote (501)	6/20/1998 8:37:00 AM
From: Mike Milde	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1031

<< I think that the next quarterly financial statement will tell the true story.... Anything wrong with that philosophy??>> Not to nit-pick, but one quarter never tells the "true story" about any company. Keep the big picture in mind when investing. Mike

To: ratan lal who wrote (501)	6/20/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: RBB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1031

On June 7th (Post# 421) Ratan wrote, FYI I invested in SEEC after it bace the hot topic in SI. I bought 5000 shares at 8 3/4 just based on the posts here and sold at 10 when I realised that there was no unkown reason for the rise in its stock price. I am still interested in investing in SEEC BUT I will llok for reason before jumping in. I may trade in SEEC based on TA. On June 11th (Post# 444) Ratan wrote, pr - vol. so far is 52700. would be interesting to find out how much of it from people on this thread. On June 12th (Post# 463) Ratan wrote, And I was the sucker that bought it !!!!!!!!! I have got to stop reading/believing the hype on SI Looks like you made money by trading based on the hype on this thread (You bought @ 8.75 and sold it @10.00). No need to thank this thread. If you were so skeptical about SEEC fundamentals and TA was the only reason to invest in SEEC (based on June 7th post), why blame the thread or SEEC (I have not seen any posts on this thread suggesting a buy based on technical analysis). Can you please tell me if Mr.Buffett relies on TA (pardon me for my ignorance). If it is any consolation, most of us have bought it at a price much higher than your price and we are still holding/buying SEEC. -Rambabu