Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kurt R. who wrote (13760)	6/20/1998 9:22:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Dude, nothing cheap about it, that's one of the first rules in investing. You just don't want to hear it, your choice.

To: Kurt R. who wrote (13760)	6/20/1998 11:36:00 AM
From: ShoppinTheNet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Richard, I do not feel that this is one of the rules of investing. Stockholders can and often do suggest or demand changes to all aspects of the companies that they own. CALPERS is a very large investment organization that is notorious for calling in management of the companies they own to discuss the management of the company and its business ethics. If CALPERS owned Naxos and did the same would you all stand up against them? The only difference I see between Kurt and CALPERS is the size of the investment funds available to each. Being an individual investor Kurt should not be held with less right to speak out. Our good friend PJ has stated very far back on this thread that the Internet is changing the power of the individual investor and the way corporations will be run in the future. (PJ most likely will look up this post I am sure) It is not fair to blast Kurt for wanting to discuss a topic that is a legitimate topic in this stock as well as with all others he may own. The resistance for all to discuss this topic, I feel says quite a bit about your thoughts regarding the subject at hand.