Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (1748)	6/21/1998 2:51:00 AM
From: John Sladek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12810

Lisa, >>John S. could be joking or he could be serious.... Maybe I should have added to somewhere on my previous post: "parody post, not to be taken seriously", but if you have to explain a joke then you usually wind up ruining it. I kind of thought that it was obvious that I was joking, but maybe I'm assuming too much - after all I thought that the FBN thread was pretty obvious, while others are still trying to figure it out. I figured that the WSJ had such a good reputation that it it would be pretty obvious that a bunch of supposed small-time stock hustlers would not be able to plant a cover story there - it is the WSJ after all, not some mimeographed tout sheet. >>> because there are actually people who think like this.... That's why Tread Morons has become my favorite thread. >>>there in lies the art of figuring out who is who and what is what in the FBN saga... And on every SI thread... Regards, John Sladek P.S., Please don't nominate me as a thread moron on the basis of the previous post. My ego is too fragile (NOT), and I am trying to maintain my reputation on SI as a credible poster.