SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Alfacell (ACEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Fish who wrote (1397)6/20/1998 5:40:00 PM
From: David Cathcart  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1533
 
Fish,

<<Morevoer, she [Gail Fraser] has even hinted that the results of the Phase 3 study may not be efficacious. I believe this was posted several months ago.>>

You may be referring to my post reiterating a conversation I had with Gail, where she had said something to the effect of "if the data from the phase III trial for Onconase looks good.". You may want to read into this that she hinted that the drug may not be efficacious. However, from a liability standpoint, it would have been foolish and unprofessional if she had said anything more positive than the "if" statement. Without question, there is risk in this investment. Also without question, there is tremendous upside potential. Everything rides on the "if."

David



To: Fish who wrote (1397)6/22/1998 10:40:00 AM
From: Tom Scozzafava  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1533
 
Fish. What is your point? You are repeating exactly what I just said -- that I DON'T believe Gail Fraser is acting unethically. To that point, would she say that SHE believes in the company and its drug if the data was showing the drug's ineffectiveness? Would she say "don't worry, the drug will take care of itself" if the drug didn't work? If you believe she is ethical and not perpetuating a fraud (which, apparently, we both do) then how can that be consistent with your other, aforementioned theory of dragging this out to sell stock, etc?

I have no idea what you inferred from my last message???